You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics of included studies

From: A systematic review of the factors associated with the course of borderline personality disorder symptoms in adolescence

Author (year) Country Study design,BPD assessments Population Sample characteristics Sociodemographic data Outcome assessment
Barnow et al. (2013) [19] Germany Longitudinal,2 assessments Community, Greifswaldfamily study N = 381; range 11–18;55.1% female NR Structured Clinical Interview forDSM-III-R (SCID-II)1 and SCIDII-forDSM-IV1,2
Bornovalova et al. (2018) [20] U.S. Longitudinalcohort study,3 assessments Community, Minnesotatwin family study N = 1.080; range 14–24;100% female 95.3% white Minnesota Borderline PersonalityDisorder Scale (MBPD)1
Dixon-Gordon et al. (2016) [21] U.S. Longitudinal,4 assessments Community, Pittsburghgirls study N = 113; range 16–18;100% female Low-income neighborhoods; 65%African American, 35% White; 55%of familes receive public assisstance Structured Clinical Interview forDSM-IV Personality Disorders(SIDP-IV)2
Ehrenreich, Beron &Underwood (2016) [22] U.S. Longitudinal,2 assessments Community N = 287; range 14–19;52% female 23.1% African American, 1.6% Asian,61.6% Caucasian, 18.3% Hispanic,5.4.% other The Mclean Screening Instrumentfor BPD (MSI)1
Greenfield et al. (2015) [23] Canada Longitudinal,2 assessments (In)Outpatient N = 286; range 12–18;72% female 69.5% Caucasian, 7.5.% AfricanAmerican, 2.2.% Hispanic, 3.1%Aboriginal, 5.3.% Asian, 12.4% other Abbreviated Diagnostic Interviewfor Borderlines (Ab-DIB)1
Hallquist, Hipwell & Stepp(2015) [24] U.S. Longitudinal,4 assessments Community, Pittsburghgirls study N = 2.228; range 14–17;100% female Low-income neighborhoods International Personality DisorderExamination-Screen (IPDE-S)1
Haltigan & Vaillancourt(2016) [25] Canada Longitudinal,4 assessments Community, McMasterteen study N = 566; range 13–16;55.5% female NR Borderline Personality Features Scalefor Children (BPFS-C)1
Lazarus et al. (2019) [26] U.S. Longitudinal,5 assessments Community, Pittsburghgirls study N = 2.310; range 15–19,100% female Low-income neighborhoods; 59.8%Black, 40.2% White; 33.2% of familiesreceive public ssisstance International Personality DisorderExamination (IPDE-BOR)1
Sharp et al. (2020) [27] U.S. Longitudinal,5 assessments Community N = 1.042; range 13–18;56% female 31.4% Hispanic, 29.4% White, 27.9%African Americans, 3.6% Asian, 7.7%other; 19.4% reveived mental healthtreatment Borderline Personality Features Scalefor Children (BPFS-C)1
Stepp, Keenan, Hipwell &Krueger (2014) [28] U.S. Longitudinal,6 assessments Community, Pittsburghgirls study N = 2.282; range 14–19;100% female Low-income neighborhoods; 53%African American, 41.2% EuropeanAmerican, 5.8% other; International Personality DisordersExamination (IPDEBOR)1
Stepp et al. (2014) [6] U.S. Longitudinal,4 assessments Community, Pittsburghgirls study N = 2.212; range 14–17;100% female 38.9% of families receive publicassisstance International Personality DisordersExamination (IPDEBOR)1
Stepp & Lazarus (2017) [29] U.S. Longitudinal,9 assessments Community, Pittsburghgirls study N = 2.344; range 14–22;100% female Low-income neighborhoods; 53%African American, 41.2% Caucasian,5.8% other International Personality DisordersExamination (IPDEBOR)1
Strandholm et al. (2017) [30] Finland Longitudinal,2 assessments Outpatient, Adolescentdepression study N = 218; range 13–19;81.5% female Low-income neighborhoods; 58.7%minority race; 38.9% of familiesreceive public assisstance Structured Clinical Interview andScreen (Personality Questionnaire)for DSM-IV PDs1,2
Vanwoerden, Leavitt, Gallagher& Temple (2019) [31] U.S. Longitudinal,5 assessments Community N = 818; range 16–21;58% female 32% Hispanic, 31.3% White, 27.1%African American, 1.8% Asian, 7.7.%other Borderline Personality FeaturesScale for Children (BPFS-C)1
  1. 1 self-report instrument; 2 clinical interview; NR not reported
\